Close Menu
WVDEP
  • Business
  • Games
  • Archive
  • Bahasa Indonesia
What's Hot

Our Recommendation: Starburst Slot Review (RTP 96.09%)

05/06/2023

Down The Rails Slot Demo Review: Play, Payout, Free Spins & Bonuses

16/01/2023

Green Lantern Slot Review – Theme, Features & Where to Play

29/07/2022
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
WVDEP
  • Business
  • Games
  • Archive
  • Bahasa Indonesia
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
WVDEP
Home»Archive»Air Toxics: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)
Archive

Air Toxics: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)

Staff WVDEPBy Staff WVDEP01/02/2021Updated:01/02/2021No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The first National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) were originally required by the 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA). These standards were developed for sources and source categories that were determined to pose adverse risk to human health by the emission of HAPs. The EPA Administrator was directed to set the standard “at the level which in his judgment provides an ample margin of safety to protect the public health from such hazardous air pollutants.” These risk-based NESHAPs are located in 40CFR61 and incorporated by reference in 45CSR34. The NESHAPs applies to all existing and new/modified sources.

45CSR34 incorporates by reference federal air toxics regulations promulgated under the NESHAP program.

45CSR34 (incorporates Federal rules 40CFR61 and 40CFR63)

Congress directed EPA to develop a program to develop further the regulation of HAPs in Section 112 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). While the standards for major sources of HAPs developed per this section are also designated as NESHAPs, they are established according to Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) requirements. MACT is a technology-based standard, as opposed to the original conception of NESHAPs as a risk-based standard. These technology-based NESHAPs are located at 40 CFR 63 and incorporated by reference in 45CSR34.

EPA has set MACT standards for over 100 source categories as specified under Section 112(d) . While these MACT standards typically apply to major sources (those at facilities with greater than 10 ton/yr of a single HAP, or greater than 25 ton/yr of aggregate HAPs), many MACTs also apply to area sources (sources with less than 10/25 ton/yr HAP thresholds); a few MACTs apply only to area sources. EPA has also begun to identify additional area sources of air toxics for regulation per its Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy as mandated by Section 112(k) of the CAAA. The definition of major source depends upon a facility’s potential to emit not its actual emissions.

For new and reconstructed plants (those starting construction or reconstruction after EPA proposes the MACT standard for that type of facility), the MACT standard must be at least as stringent as the emission control achieved in practice by the single best controlled similar plant within the category or subcategory. Thus, a single plant’s level of control appears to establish the “floor” for new sources, regardless of whether this control level can be met by other companies with different economic circumstances.

EPA’s Air Toxics Website contains a wealth of information, including the text of promulgated, proposed, and upcoming MACT standards.

There is a risk-based component to MACT standards that follows the initial technology-based MACT standard. Under the 1990 CAAA, EPA was mandated to set technology-based standards (based on Maximum Achievable Control Technology, MACT) for the source categories specified under 112(d). While these MACT standards typically apply to major sources (those at facilities with greater than 10 tpy of a single HAP, or greater than 25 tpy of aggregate HAPs), many MACTs also apply to area sources (sources with less than the 10/25 tpy HAP thresholds); a few MACTs apply only to area sources. Section 112(f) specifies that EPA determine whether or not to promulgate additional standards beyond the MACT within 8 years after promulgation of the MACT standard (but within 9 years after promulgation of the 2-year MACT source categories).

Thus, EPA is required to evaluate the NESHAPs developed according to the MACT standards for any “residual risk” with 8 years of promulgation. If the “residual risk” for a source category does not protect public health with “an ample margin of safety”, then EPA must promulgate health-based standards for that source category to further reduce HAP emissions. EPA is required to set more stringent standards if necessary to prevent adverse environmental effects (considering energy, costs, and other relevant factors).

The chart, “National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) Applicability Determination“, contains information which may be used as an aid in determining applicability with NESHAPs (contained in 45CSR15 or 45CSR34) and associated regulations.

EPA has also began to establish air toxic standards based on generally achievable control technology (GACT) for certain area (nonmajor) source categories.

This webpage is intended to provide information to aid in determining rule and program applicability, but is only to be used in conjunction with the regulations themselves and in consultation with the DAQ in order to make a final applicability determination.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticlePollution Prevention and Open Dumps
Next Article Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

Related Posts

Guide to Aquatic Invertebrates of the Upper Midwest

01/02/2021

Dunkard Creek 2009 Fish Kill Information

01/02/2021

Leaking Underground Storage Tanks

01/02/2021

Pollution Prevention and Open Dumps

01/02/2021
  • Reviews
  • Popular Post
8.4

Project Cars 2 by Bandai Namco Entertainment Review: The Best Super Realistic Racing Simulation Game

25/12/2021

Grid Video Game Review: Ordered Racing Concept On Amazing World Series

04/02/2021

How to Play Gates of Olympus Slots

02/01/2022

Football for Children that Can Be Introduced Early on

17/07/2021

How to Make an Easy Fafafa Higgs Domino Island Jackpot

18/10/2021
Don't Miss
Gambling

Our Recommendation: Starburst Slot Review (RTP 96.09%)

By Staff WVDEP05/06/2023

In this starburst slot review, you will discover its mechanics and results. While modern 3D…

Down The Rails Slot Demo Review: Play, Payout, Free Spins & Bonuses

16/01/2023

Green Lantern Slot Review – Theme, Features & Where to Play

29/07/2022

Wild Wheel Big Money Review: RTP 96.98% (Push Gaming)

26/07/2022

Office of Oil and Gas

01/03/2022

2022 March Madness Sweet Sixteen Best Bets

24/02/2022
About Us
About Us

An independent information portal. Where we share stories. Starting from important things to types of entertainment. Whatever it is! When we think it’s potentially useful, we’ll post it. Gentlemen …. We have the technology. We have the capability to produce it. Better than he was before. Better. Stronger. Faster.

We're accepting new partnerships right now.

Email Us: admin[@]wvdep.org
Contact: +62 0812-1391-1995

Our Picks

Top 10 Best Casinos in California to Start Your Gambling Adventure

08/02/2022

Grid Video Game Review: Ordered Racing Concept On Amazing World Series

04/02/2021

How to Win at Online casinos and Tips

17/07/2021
Quick Links
  • Tentang Kami
  • Judi Slot Online
  • Slot Gacor
  • Online Slot
  • Slot Mudah Menang
  • Judi Togel
  • Keluaran Togel Hari Ini
  • Live Draw SGP
  • Live Draw HK
  • MPO Slot
  • Slot Pulsa
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Kontak
  • Terms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2025 WVDep. Business, Games and Gambling News Portal

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version